The NCAA took another step by cracking down on booster-driven collectives when it comes to name, image, and likeness (NIL) payments.
The Division I Board of Directors approved the new NIL guidelines on Monday, clarifying existing statutes that prohibit reinforcements from participating in the draft. The group of school presidents approved guidance that college leaders hope will prompt NCAA enforcement staff to investigate potential rule violations, both past and future, as reported by Sports Illustrated In the past week.
Despite the clarity that comes 10 months after the NIL era, the guidelines are meant to be retroactive. Under the guidelines, NCAA enforcement staff are free to investigate those who have flagrantly violated statutes in the past.
The primary goal of the guidance is to eliminate a booster’s involvement in recruiting, members of an NCAA NIL task force said last week. Officials say boosters and booster-led collectives are using transactions disguised as NILs to induce prospects to sign with their school or convince current players to stay on their school’s roster, something SI detailed last Monday. .
Any promoter or promoter-led collective that associated with a prospect on recruiting, on another college team, or in high school, will be found to have violated NCAA rules, and the promoter’s school is at risk of sanctions, Colorado Athletic director Rick George told SI last week. George is a member of the NCAA’s NIL Task Force.
A promoter, or a collective run by promoters, “may not contact a student-athlete or others affiliated with a student-athlete to encourage them to remain enrolled or attend an institution,” George said, citing the guidelines.
“What’s happening now, I just know what I’m hearing, is that incentives break the rules,” Ohio State AD Gene Smith, also a member of the task force, told SI last week from the Big Ten meetings. in Scottsdale, Arizona. “Hopefully this happens. On Monday I will give more clarity and guidelines. But then, [NCAA] the app has to enforce. Schools must also enforce it. That’s the other part. At the end of the day, you have an institutional responsibility to enforce.”
However, it’s unclear if the NCAA will jump into action all of a sudden.
NCAA enforcement has been unwilling and perhaps even unable to enforce existing statutes, George and Smith say. For one thing, the organization is concerned that any app will trigger a series of antitrust legal challenges. Second, NCAA law enforcement personnel are ill-equipped for a large-scale national investigation. It has dropped between 15 and 20 members due to layoffs due to the pandemic. Smith says the association plans to replace the people eventually.
The NCAA’s enforcement staff situation “is the biggest issue” when it comes to why the organization hasn’t thoroughly pursued violators, George says. But industry insiders say any app will invariably draw lawsuits from wealthy donors.
Scroll to Continue
Hundreds of deals have been struck with booster collectives, now numbering around 100, many of which have already put together more than $5 million in a kind of player salary pool labeled “NIL.” Boosters say they comply with state laws governing NIL and/or interim NCAA policy, and have proof, say those who spoke to SI.
“We think our platform is the only one in the country that would really be resistant to any attack from the NCAA, because we have a quid pro quo,” said John Ruiz, a prominent Miami booster and billionaire who plans to spend millions on NIL efforts. Hurricanes athletics. “Payments are made to them electronically every two weeks. It’s a pretty well-oiled machine.”
The loss of the NCAA Supreme Court in the Alston case last summer, along with a bevy of state laws protecting boosters, make it difficult for the governing body to enforce its own statutes.
“If they punish kids, they’ll have lawyers lining up,” says Arizona sports attorney Gregg Clifton. “There will be a class action suit within 48 hours.”
The NCAA sanctions are not expected to target player eligibility, but instead will penalize schools in other ways for failing to monitor their reinforcements, task force members said.
Many promoters and collectives are managed by platforms such as Opendorse that ensure that they comply with the tracking of all athlete transactions. Several are managed by experienced sports agents and attorneys who have maintained documentation of their communication and quid pro quos that are necessary to comply with state law and interim NCAA policy.
“I think if the NCAA can go after schools in some way based on what the collectives are doing as representatives of a school’s athletic interests, that could stop some of the incentive stuff that’s going on right now.” He says. Mit Winter, sports lawyer who advises various groups. “But if the NCAA declares an athlete ineligible, a lawsuit is likely to follow. The same with the promoters and the collectives”.
A plague on the NCAA for years, potential litigation was the main reason the association abandoned plans last summer to implement a more permanent policy with guardrails governing NIL, opening the door for wealthy donors to creatively maneuver around vague interim guidelines.
Now, 10 months into the NIL era of college sports, as the elite Power 5 program drives funding for football teams in a high-priced bidding war, the organization is shifting into attack mode. It raises more questions than it answers.
“Whether it’s possible to remove the bell remains to be seen,” Big 12 commissioner Bob Bowlsby tells the task force that spent two years on a permanent policy only to see it abandoned at the last minute last June. “It seems to me that we would have been infinitely better off if we had gone ahead and implemented the railings.”
More college coverage:
• Leaders urge NCAA to enforce NIL guidelines
• NIL, ‘Booster Banks’ and recruitment wars
• CFB working on a solution to list depletion